The subtlety that they're missing, and that I wanted to get across at the outset, is that when they

**an equation, they are already**

*solve***it's true. It's the logical equivalent of saying "it's true because it's true." But identities are to be**

*assuming***- and proving something is true is a lot trickier than assuming it's true - just ask a lawyer.**

*proven*So while the rest of this week will be devoted to reinforcing their algebra skills, today I wanted to introduce some basic logical ideas, without actually saying them out loud. Instead I used my

*subliminal messaging powers,*which will appear here in

*red italic text*, which is why I have called this Subliminal Text Messaging!

The trap:

I did this today with the whole class at first, no notes, no recorded lesson. The part you see below took about 15 minutes, after which, they worked in groups of 2-3. I said pretty much these actual words, but their answers are of course composites.

Me: True or false?

(x + 3)(x - 3) = x² - 9

All of them, immediately: True!

*(*

*Identities are about algebra that you already know)*

Me: Convince me.

Them: Well if you foil you get x² - 9. (a volunteer did this on the board):

*(*

*Work on the LHS only)*

Me: So what? What does that have to do with anything?

*(*

*Wait a minute - what was the question again?)*

Them: Well...it's the same as the other side.

Me: So what?

Them: Well since it came to the same thing as up here (point to x² - 9 on RHS) then we were right, it was true.

*(Are you saying that i*

*f LHS = something, and RHS = that same something, then LHS = RHS?)*

Me: Assuming of course that your "foiling" was correct.

Them: Yes. Oh. Was it?

*(*

*J*

*ust messing with their minds. :) And that we convince by using things we already know to be true.)*

Me: It was, no worries. While you were doing this "foiling", did you need to look at the x² - 9?

Them: No.

*(*

*This is different from solving an equation - you're not doing something to both sides here, you're looking at one side only, then comparing it to the other.)*

Me: What about this - true or false?

(x + 2)(x - 8) + 6x = (x + 4)(x - 4)

Them: ........

Me: What's the matter? Why isn't anyone answering me?

Them: We're working on it....

*(*

*Students' likely s*

*ubliminal message: Geez Miss, take a pill.)*

Me: Oh this one isn't quite so obvious, eh? How come?

*(*

*What's the difference between this one and the last one?)*

Them: Because there's more steps.

*Me: Well how about this: Susie you simplify the LHS, Johnnie, you do the RHS, and we'll see what happens:*

*(*

*Two different people = t*

*he two sides are being done completely independently of each other - again, this ain't no equation being solved)*

Susie: My side comes to x² - 16

Johnnie: My side comes to x² - 16

Them: It was true!

Me: How does that mean it was true?

*(Even when both sides got algebra-ed, i*

*f LHS = something, and RHS = that same something, then LHS = RHS? Sure about that?)*

Them: Both sides came to the same thing, so they must have been equal. Like "this equals that".

*(*

*Students' likely s*

*ubliminal message: Isn't that just common sense?!?)*

Me: Susie and Johnny, while you were doing your side, did you have to look at the other side in order to proceed?

Susie and Johnny: Nope. But I did at the end.

*(*

*The only reason to check the other side is to see if it's the same)*

Me: Great! Now how about this:

Them: ........true?

Me: Ah but I didn't ask you this time if it was true or false......in fact, simply by using the word "Prove", I'm already telling you that it's.....

Them: ...that it's true? ....

*(it's not*

*about deciding true or false, it's about convincing by using other things we already know to be true, like algebra, trigonometry, and common sense....)*

Me: Right! But now explain to me why you thought it was true.....

We then did the above really simple example together, then off they went in their groups to do harder ones. I caught a few egregious algebra crimes and nipped them in the bud, and gave some groups harder ones to sink their teeth into, so it was a good opportunity for differentiation.

I plan to have them submit three proved identities on their blogs later this week. If I got my message across, I'll see proofs, rather than autopilot solving. More later!

If you have had success in helping your students with trig identities, or if you have your own subliminal messages to share, please do!

*(This was also posted at The Flipped Learning Journal.)*

Is there a typoe in this blog? Which is it, x² - 4 or x² - 9?

ReplyDeleteYes, there was, how's that for ironic? Fixed now, I think, thanks!

Delete