My students did this activity yesterday, in which they unwittingly drew a parabola using geometry instead of algebra. So they "knew" about the focus and directrix of a parabola, and that all the points on a parabola are the same distance from the focus as they are from the directrix. And they "knew" the formula c = 1/(4a).
But I had a sneaking feeling they didn't really KNOW, you know?
So today I showed them this:
...and asked "Which point is the focus of this parabola?" There were guesses for each of the colours. Some said they all could be the focus. Bingo. They know what it is but not what it isn't. That's not KNOWing.
"If the pink one is the focus, then which line has to be the directrix?"
Everyone went with the pink line of course, but their reasons were varied: because the colour matches, because it's the farthest away, because it's the same distance from the vertex as the pink dot.
Right. We've just established that as soon as you have a focus, you also have a directrix - they work as a team. That's a slightly bigger picture. Also I need to knock it off with the colour coding.
"Is it possible that any one of these could be the focus, as long as we pair it with the correct directrix?" Some said yes, some said no.
Time to test out their hypotheses. I had everyone make a dot somewhere on the parabola with their initials.
"Draw L1 and L2 for your point using the green focus/directrix."
The board looked something like this:
It was very fortunate that K picked the vertex for her point!
"Does anyone's point have L1 = L2?"
K's did, no one else's though.
"Well does that mean the green point is the focus or isn't the focus?"
Great discussion on why it isn't - it's not good enough to have one point on the parabola with L1 = L2, they ALL have to have it. They knew that yesterday, but this was knowing on a different level. I think the fact that each person "owned" a different point reinforces the all or nothing idea here.
Then each person picked a new points, and we tested out the blue pair. As soon as ONE person's point didn't work, the reaction was immediate - it can't be the right pair.
Now they knew that there is only ONE possible location for the focus and directrix of a parabola. Move anything and it doesn't have the L1 = L2 property.
We finally tested the pink pair and found it to be the actual focus and directrix. Now they knew where it was and where it wasn't, and there's only one possibility for the former.
Way to drop the ball McSquared:
The final point I wanted to make was the connection between what they just did and the formula c = 1/4a. Not the algebraic connection, but the bigger, deeper one:
The numbers are connected like this: Change the value of a, and you'll change the value of c, and vice versa.
The things are connected like this: Change the parabola, and you change the focus and vice versa.
Unfortunately, that part was just me talking, which I'll replace next time with them doing something, not sure what. Something involving matching parabolas with c values and focus/directrix pairs.....it was time to zoom out here and I dropped the ball, but I'll pick it up next year.
But I do think I helped them to KNOW, you know?
Thanks for sharing this lesson ... what a great example of formative assessment. I would not have thought to ask about the focus and directrix like you have, and so I am glad to learn from you!ReplyDelete
Thank you for reading and for your comment Jennifer! It actually never occurred to me that I was doing a formative assessment - but you're right, thank you for that insight. And your site looks amazing, I'm going to go check it out again as soon as I hit publish!Delete
You are an awesome teacher, my dear friend!!ReplyDelete
Aw thank you! Coming from you, that means a heck of a lot!Delete
I am a student research assistant at Montana Tech of the University of Montana. Technology has created exciting ways to connect with others and form professional learning networks. As a part of an active member of a social media community made up of teachers, I wanted to contact you to ask you to participate in a study our research group is conducting.ReplyDelete
Research shows that face-to-face professional networks provide much needed professional and personal support to teachers. You and the community you belong to are providing these types of support using social media. We are interested in learning more about your experiences using social media to connect with other teachers and your opinions about online professional networks.
The purpose of our study is to learn how professional learning networks created through social media are similar or different than face-to-face networks and what you feel are advantages of using social media to connect with other teachers. Our hope is that the results of this study will inform how professional networks for teachers are designed in the future. If you are interested in participating, please send an email to me at teacherblogPLN@gmail.com. I will send you a link to a short online survey and will set up time for a short skype interview.
If you have any questions you would like to ask about the study, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Department of Mathematical Sciences
Montana Tech of the University of Montana
Hi Kaitlyn, I'd be happy to participate, but the email you gave me doesn't seem to work. My email is in my profile, perhaps you can use that to let me know what the correct email address is?Delete